Re: [BUGS] BUG #6532: pg_upgrade fails on Python stored procedures
От | Stuart Bishop |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #6532: pg_upgrade fails on Python stored procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADmi=6M8Z5x+r12Xvz17nWrk7bF_X+bfnpNi-OrK+N16Dfn9WQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #6532: pg_upgrade fails on Python stored procedures (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #6532: pg_upgrade fails on Python stored procedures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Well, it will because, by creating the symlink, you allowed this > function to be restored into the new database, and it isn't properly > hooked to the plpython language. I wonder if you should just delete it > because I believe you already have the right plpython2 helper functions > in place. Can you run this query for me in one of the problem databases > in the new and/or old cluster and send me the output: > > SELECT proname,probin FROM pg_proc WHERE probin LIKE '%python%'; # SELECT nspname,proname,probin FROM pg_proc,pg_namespace WHERE probin LIKE '%python%' and pg_proc.pronamespace=pg_namespace.oid; nspname | proname | probin ------------+-----------------------+------------------pg_catalog | plpython_call_handler | $libdir/plpythonpublic |plpython_call_handler | $libdir/plpython (2 rows) I have no idea how I managed to grow the duplicate in the public schema, but this does seem to be the source of the confusion. I might be able to dig out when I grew it from revision control, but I don't think that would help. > What we need is for pg_dumpall to _not_ output those handlers. Or pick it up in the check stage and make the user resolve the problem. If I shot myself in the foot in some particularly obtuse way, it might not be sane to bend over backwards making pg_upgrade repair things. -- Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net> http://www.stuartbishop.net/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: