Re: Thoughts on using Text::Template for our autogenerated code?
| От | Corey Huinker |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Thoughts on using Text::Template for our autogenerated code? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CADkLM=f=4zc8+REW5ZDeKT_t=-+A8mmCA31woOTRpz=kZ41Qcg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Thoughts on using Text::Template for our autogenerated code? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Thoughts on using Text::Template for our autogenerated code?
Re: Thoughts on using Text::Template for our autogenerated code? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I don't think that's remotely a starter. Asking people to install an old and possibly buggy version of a perl module is not something we should do.
I think the barrier for this is pretty high. I try to keep module requirements for the buildfarm client pretty minimal, and this could affect a much larger group of people.
Those are good reasons.
For those who already responded, are your concerns limited to the dependency issue? Would you have concerns about a templating library that was developed by us and included in-tree? I'm not suggesting suggesting we write one at this time, at least not until after we make a here-doc-ing pass first, but I want to understand the concerns before embarking on any refactoring.
For those who already responded, are your concerns limited to the dependency issue? Would you have concerns about a templating library that was developed by us and included in-tree? I'm not suggesting suggesting we write one at this time, at least not until after we make a here-doc-ing pass first, but I want to understand the concerns before embarking on any refactoring.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: