Re: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)
От | Corey Huinker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADkLM=efKiQUg9NQCgOGnJ12_U8T1GpeExeA1NQ2Ke7DjcWbUA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <span dir="ltr"><<ahref="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us" target="_blank">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>></span> wrote:<br /><blockquoteclass="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">DavidSteele <<a href="mailto:david@pgmasters.net">david@pgmasters.net</a>> writes:<br /> > On 3/17/16 11:30AM, David G. Johnston wrote:<br /></span><span class="">>> I'd call it "generate_dates(...)" and be done withit.<br /> >> We would then have:<br /> >> generate_series()<br /> >> generate_subscripts()<br /> >>generate_dates()<br /><br /> > To me this completely negates the idea of this "just working" which is<br /> >why it got a +1 from me in the first place. If I have to remember to<br /> > use a different function name then I'dprefer to just cast on the<br /> > timestamp version of generate_series().<br /><br /></span>Yeah, this point greatlyweakens the desirability of this function IMO.<br /> I've also gone from "don't care" to "-1".<br /><br /> regards, tom lane<br /></blockquote></div><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Since that diminishes thealready moderate support for this patch, I'll withdraw it.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br/></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br/></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div></div>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: