Re: \timing interval
От | Corey Huinker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: \timing interval |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADkLM=eWXqyg9hMQU2BaND4RS+FG2=oNEjXq7bcG3qJSe4afmA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: \timing interval (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: \timing interval
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 7/9/16 4:00 PM, Andrew Gierth wrote:How about
Time: 1234567.666 ms (20m 34.6s)
That's similar to what I had in mind, so I'd be happy with that.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
If the query took less than a second, timing display is unchanged.
Otherwise, print the ms time, followed by a more human readable form accurate to 0.001s.
# select 1; select pg_sleep(1); select pg_sleep(71); select pg_sleep (3601); select pg_sleep(24*3601);?column?----------1(1 row)Time: 1.575 mspg_sleep----------(1 row)Time: 1002.568 ms (1.003s)pg_sleep----------(1 row)Time: 71041.022 ms (1m 11.041s)pg_sleep----------(1 row)Time: 3601083.544 ms (1h 0m 1.084s)pg_sleep----------(1 row)Time: 86424018.416 ms (1d 0h 0m 24.018s)
As-is, there isn't much that could be done for regression or documentation changes, so I'll just leave this here.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: