Re: Declarative partitioning
| От | Corey Huinker |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Declarative partitioning |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CADkLM=cLntJWEzCjW1LUbnRAYz6+-ZooO0FXKg+7rdkTaVE+2g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Declarative partitioning (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Declarative partitioning
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
The individual patches have commit messages that describe code changes.
This is registered in the upcoming CF. Feedback and review is greatly
welcomed!
Thanks,
Amit
We have a current system that is currently a mix of tables, each of which is range partitioned into approximately 15 partitions (using the pgxn range partitioning extension), and those partitions are themselves date-series partitioned via pg_partman. The largest table ingests about 100M rows per day in a single ETL. I will try this patch out and see how well it compares in handling the workload. Do you have any areas of interest or concern that I should monitor?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: