Re: Use proc instead of MyProc in ProcArrayGroupClearXid()/TransactionGroupUpdateXidStatus()
От | rajesh singarapu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Use proc instead of MyProc in ProcArrayGroupClearXid()/TransactionGroupUpdateXidStatus() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADgiWi6bjr=3KhmfBB7WYOGRY7wrZ4w0p-NF+3MgBGH3b8tAFg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Use proc instead of MyProc in ProcArrayGroupClearXid()/TransactionGroupUpdateXidStatus() (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks Bharat and Amit for the review and explaining rationale. for the TransactionGroupUpdateXidStatus() change, let me see if I can piggy back this change on something more valuable. thanks Rajesh On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 11:58 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 3:17 PM rajesh singarapu <rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > In both TransactionGroupUpdateXidStatus and ProcArrayGroupClearXid > > global MyProc is used. for consistency, replaced with a function local variable. > > > > In ProcArrayGroupClearXid(), currently, we always pass MyProc as proc, > so the change suggested by you will work but I think if in the future > someone calls it with a different proc, then the change suggested by > you won't work. The change in TransactionGroupUpdateXidStatus() looks > good but If we don't want to change ProcArrayGroupClearXid() then I am > not sure if there is much value in making the change in > TransactionGroupUpdateXidStatus(). > > -- > With Regards, > Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: