Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support
| От | Jonah H. Harris |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CADUqk8XWkurQ64+Hi2eMQix3-YqYpL=AJ70BhH6zB0=6xG5F9w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support
Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:25 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote:
Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 09:50, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> escreveu:Re: Peter Eisentraut
> What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.I'm curious, how do you intend to solve a linking problem with OpenSSL-vs-GPL-readline, with another GPL product?
WolfSSL, will provide a commercial license for PostgreSQL?
Isn't LIbreSSL a better alternative?
Somewhere, I recall seeing an open-source OpenSSL compatibility wrapper for WolfSSL. Assuming that still exists, this patch seems entirely unnecessary.
Jonah H. Harris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: