Re: What's the logic of touching /var/log/pgsql ?
От | Strahinja Kustudić |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What's the logic of touching /var/log/pgsql ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADKbJJXfa4TC7wRCJNH_QHqFETK5F0rJ7nUU34HncoihB_axiA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What's the logic of touching /var/log/pgsql ? (Strahinja Kustudić <strahinjak@nordeus.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: What's the logic of touching /var/log/pgsql ?
|
Список | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Here is a patch which removes this from all currently maintained versions.
Strahinja Kustudić | Lead System Engineer | Nordeus
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Strahinja Kustudić <strahinjak@nordeus.com> wrote:
Sorry for replying to an old topic, but it would be really good to remove this from new packages, since it's useless, and that file path could be a nice directory for storing postgres logs outside the data dir.Do you guys accept patches for the RPM repository?
Strahinja Kustudić | Lead System Engineer | NordeusOn Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 15:52 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> The PGDG spec files for PostgreSQL have the following lines in the
> server preinst section:
>
> %pre server
> ... creates Pg user ...
> touch /var/log/pgsql
> chown postgres:postgres /var/log/pgsql
> chmod 0700 /var/log/pgsql
>
>
> What's the logic there? Why create an empty /var/log/pgsql file owned
> by user 'pgsql' ? It's not used for anything and just seems confusing.
It is obsoleted, can be removed.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Вложения
В списке pgsql-pkg-yum по дате отправления: