Re: repmgr: Do we need separate versions of repmgr for separate PG versions?
От | Strahinja Kustudić |
---|---|
Тема | Re: repmgr: Do we need separate versions of repmgr for separate PG versions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADKbJJX5W3FtyvUjNgkSytf=HvsaqFS+WTrXvqWUXTRi+oZuPw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: repmgr: Do we need separate versions of repmgr for separate PG versions? (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: repmgr: Do we need separate versions of repmgr
for separate PG versions?
|
Список | pgsql-pkg-yum |
If repmgr is not PG version dependant, it should all go into the same directory, on the other hand if it is version dependant, I would add the version of postgres to the package name.
Strahinja Kustudić | Lead System Engineer | Nordeus
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:47 +0200, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> I am working on improving repmgr packaging. Do we need separate repmgr
> versions for separate PG versions? Right now, we don't have separate
> package for 9.3, and 9.4 for example. Is that an issue?
Tired me -- I meant to say:
* Right now, we don't have PostgreSQL version number in the package, but
we install them under PostgreSQL directory /usr/pgsql-9.X/... . Either
we will install the binaries and libs under /usr/bin and /usr/sbin
and /usr/lib(64), or leave the files as where they are now and add PG
version number to the package name.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
В списке pgsql-pkg-yum по дате отправления: