Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HHLEdsTK9ytTQ+XQwgCwv7vptNrS-xpYBbk_MUQApSBEEg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 18:03, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 01:02, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>
>> > From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:ishii@sraoss.co.jp]
>> >> But pg_is_in_recovery() returns true even for a promoting standby. So
>> >> you have to wait and retry to send pg_is_in_recovery() until it
>> >> finishes the promotion to find out it is now a primary. I am not sure
>> >> if backend out to be responsible for this process. If not, libpq would
>> >> need to handle it but I doubt it would be possible.
>> >
>> > Yes, the application needs to retry connection attempts until success.
>> That's not different from PgJDBC and other DBMSs.
>>
>> I don't know what PgJDBC is doing, however I think libpq needs to do
>> more than just retrying.
>>
>> 1) Try to find a node on which pg_is_in_recovery() returns false. If
>> found, then we assume that is the primary. We also assume that
>> other nodes are standbys. done.
>>
>> 2) If there's no node on which pg_is_in_recovery() returns false, then
>> we need to retry until we find it. To not retry forever, there
>> should be a timeout counter parameter.
>>
>>
> IIRC this is essentially what pgJDBC does.
Thanks for clarifying that. Pgpool-II also does that too. Seems like a
common technique to find out a primary node.
Checking the code I see we actually use show transaction_read_only.
Sorry for the confusion
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: