Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please
| От | Dave Cramer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CADK3HHKkHRBHc7DTvZMNd_C5h-XtQ+njuHQRDchCGKZgEVTv0Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please (Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Pavel,
Unfortunately I do not see a way to solve this. I've done some research on this and I don't think there are too many people that don't get the driver through maven repositories or downloading it themselves.
The distro requirements have a fundamental impedance mismatch to the java/maven ecosystem. I don't think distros can be telling projects how to organize their code or which tools to use to build them.
I understand your mandate and I sympathize but it does not align with the jdbc project's mandate.
Regards,
On 2 February 2016 at 12:04, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tuesday 26 of January 2016 16:19:25 Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > To do 5, the most sane way is to split postgresql driver into two: the
> > driver itself and osgi support (or make pgsql-full and pgsql-no-osgi).
>
> Right! Or better to have the split done so that 'pgjdbc' and
> 'pgjdbc-osgi'. E.g. by inheritance you can "enlarge" the pgjdbc
> functionality and then depend on 'pgjdbc'. That would be awesome. I
> would be able to help with packaging of 'pgjdbc-osgi' (not for Fedora
> repositories of course).
Gently pinging here :). Could we think about something like this? Has
the discussion with osgi.enterprise guys moved somewhere?
Thanks, Pavel
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: