Re: send/receive buffer size
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: send/receive buffer size |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HHKZ1jpfMBLs8aZhUq=aSkRrgoaSKY+oWwb8PWz71-+T9A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | send/receive buffer size (Shijun Kong <skong@investoranalytics.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: send/receive buffer size
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Scott, As you can see the code patch is one thing. I also have to add documentation, and test cases. It would be much easier if those things were also included in the patch. Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Scott Harrington <scotth@sns-usa.com> wrote: > Thank you Dave, will you consider the localAddress patch also? > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Dave Cramer wrote: > >> I've applied this patch with changes to use camelCase for >> sendBufferSize, and receiveBufferSize to 9.2 >> Originally supplied by Bernd Helme >> >> Dave Cramer >> >> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca >> http://www.credativ.ca >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Scott Harrington <scotth01@sns-usa.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Shijun Kong wrote: >>> >>>> I read a thread somewhere that somebody contributed a patch for adding >>>> support of configurable send/receive buffer size. Did it ever commit >>>> into >>>> master branch? I did not see any commit message about this change for >>>> last >>>> 12 months. >>> >>> >>> >>> I wondered the same last weekend and found that the patch had NOT yet >>> found >>> its way into pgjdbc on github. In case it helps you, I've attached that >>> old >>> patch in a form that should apply cleanly against the latest sources >>> (unless >>> something's changed in the last 10 days). >>> >>> Before merging, maintainers would probably want to rename the property >>> names >>> (which have underscores in this patch) to better conform to the other >>> driver >>> properties which use camelcaps for the most part. >>> >>> I have also attached a "localAddress" patch that I find useful (I think I >>> posted it myself a while ago, but in any case here's an updated patch >>> that >>> should apply more cleanly against recent sources). >>> >>> -Scott >>> >>> -- >>> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org) >>> To make changes to your subscription: >>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc >> >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: