Re: Using "where col in (?)"
| От | Dave Cramer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Using "where col in (?)" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CADK3HHJrjyUwk43qG9AAH9KaCz8GMd-oSSC4Vsntg_jKWZXACw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Using "where col in (?)" ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 11:32, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 8:25 AM Blake McBride <blake1024@gmail.com> wrote:I am getting the following JDBC error:The error is a PostgreSQL one, JDBC is just the messenger here.
ERROR: operator does not exist: integer = integer[]
Hint: No operator matches the given name and argument types. You might
need to add explicit type casts. Position: 37
select * from se_user where user_id in (?)Why are you expecting: "integer IN (integer[])" to work? It isn't documented anywhere that I'm aware of.You can write that as: "integer = ANY(integer[])" though, that is documented.
Thanks David, good catch!
Dave
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: