Re: Use of the word master
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Use of the word master |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HHJgrJ=vRK_P_6zXQtRKgm3ek0Rnm8og7MTUgcKXup7fyg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Use of the word master ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 19:19, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
On 8/5/21 2:26 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> PostgreSQL: Documentation: 13: 30.1. Publication
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/logical-replication-publication.html>
>
>
> "A /publication/ can be defined on any physical replication master."
>
> I would propose "any physical replication primary"
It could be any instance that's writable though. Perhaps:
"A publication can be defined on any database that can accept writes."
or
"A publication can be defined on any database that is not in recovery."
That said, +1 for the wording change.
Ya, the word primary is misleading here. I prefer
"A publication can be defined on any database that can accept writes."
as
introduces the concept of recovery which does not in my opinion add any clarity.
Dave
Jonathan
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: