Re: Packaging of 9.2-1001 source tarball
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Packaging of 9.2-1001 source tarball |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HHJfa1kt1iry_gEfrqx3T7GCbtP7Jx2th=v9Ycxa3vzouA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Packaging of 9.2-1001 source tarball (dmp <danap@ttc-cmc.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Packaging of 9.2-1001 source tarball
Re: Packaging of 9.2-1001 source tarball |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Dana,
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
Just looking at your build script with the source output. Why didn't you use git archive to accomplish most of this ?
Dave
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:01 PM, dmp <danap@ttc-cmc.net> wrote:
And the new pgjdbc-build.sh script I sent you Dave should now handle
that process for you in creating that tar.gz file with the given input
version number as a basis for the name. Use the -s switch to create
the source in addition to the standard jars. The top level directory
should be automatically created. If there are problems with the
script please let me know.
danap.
Dave Cramer wrote:Yes, it is a mistake.
Mine
Dave
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us<mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>> wrote:<mailto:pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org>)
I find that postgresql-jdbc-9.2-1001.src.tar.gz doesn't contain a
version-numbered top-level directory --- unpacking it just litters
your current directory with a bunch of files. I hope this is a
mistake and not new packaging policy.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: