Re: A new JDBC driver...
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A new JDBC driver... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HHJJnbwczzo5fyJi368CHNXjoc20MEweAkAt65kgXQ3LEA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A new JDBC driver... (Kevin Wooten <kdubb@me.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Yes, but it relies on extra jars who's pedigree we don't control. Which is part of the security issue.
As I said earlier I like this idea as a high performant minimal functioning driver. By minimal functioning I'd probably not implement all of the metadata API(s)
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Kevin Wooten <kdubb@me.com> wrote:
Just to put this to bed, with regards to the project under discussion, the final delivery will be a single jar file with no external dependencies. Just haven't gotten that far yet.
On Mar 12, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Bryan Varner <bvarner@polarislabs.com> wrote:
>>> I think using 3rd party dependencies is the proper way to go forward
>>> instead of reimplementing all required functionalities in every JDBC driver.
>>> That is not to say that the required dependencies should be kept to minimum.
>>
>> Two cents: it troubles me always when I hear this reasoning because the
>> external dependencies still increase the maintenance costs, no matter how
>> well managed. For instance, for JDBC/DB stuff, many people care (or are
>> mandated to care) about security and the associated maintenance.
>
> I could not agree more.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: