Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin
| От | Dave Cramer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CADK3HHJ4tsFDNNZ=YyDAEuhzVoUCCXAK0GOAvvNYkZMi-Rw3CA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 at 20:09, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
Hi,
On 2019-06-08 19:41:34 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> So the reason we are discussing using pgoutput plugin is because it is part
> of core and guaranteed to be in cloud providers solutions.
IMO people needing this should then band together and write one that's
suitable, rather than trying to coerce test_decoding and now pgoutput
into something they're not made for.
At the moment it would look a lot like pgoutput. For now I'm fine with no changes to pgoutput other than binary
Once we have some real use cases we can look at writing a new one. I would imagine we would actually start with
pgoutput and just add to it.
Thanks,
Dave
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: