Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HH+gQ99XFoADC5vq4EL02J2Hh+YU3sAimb0Hh6r8EY-4LA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete ("James Pang (chaolpan)" <chaolpan@cisco.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Please check attached. Removed some dbname and tablename , the interesting thing is we only see this issue by JDBC driver client, for psql client , only 25MB memory and similar SQL plan used.
Thanks,
James
From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 3:05 PM
To: James Pang (chaolpan) <chaolpan@cisco.com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
> > Yesterday, when workload test, a lot of Postgresql JDBC connections
> > use 150-160MB memory , so we got ERROR: out of memory
Would you please share a reproducer? (e.g. DDL for the table, test code)
Have you tried capturing memory context information for the backend that consumes memory?
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: