Re: oid int issue with CachedRowSet upgrading from JDBC 8.4 to 9.1
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: oid int issue with CachedRowSet upgrading from JDBC 8.4 to 9.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HH+Mbi5OcqUCKTAKev98C4ZYTuTm00Dqg2q1bzE6Gar2Ng@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: oid int issue with CachedRowSet upgrading from JDBC 8.4 to 9.1 (otran <otran@switchfly.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: oid int issue with CachedRowSet upgrading from JDBC 8.4 to 9.1
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Owen, So did I miss something ? You said that your OID's were larger than an int didn't you ? If so even if the signature of the method is correct how do you expect it to work ? Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:59 PM, otran <otran@switchfly.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > This did work when we were using the 8.4 jdbc driver. With 9.1, we see a > call com.sun.rowset.CachedRowSetImpl.initMetaData(CachedRowSetImpl.java:701) > that is trying to read the OID now when building this metadata. > > So CacheRowSetImpl is just highlighting a difference between the 8.4 and 9.1 > jdbc drivers in terms of the implementation of grabbing the initMetaData. > > Thanks, > Owen > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/oid-int-issue-with-CachedRowSet-upgrading-from-JDBC-8-4-to-9-1-tp5551763p5551923.html > Sent from the PostgreSQL - jdbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: