> Dana, > > The new site is up! > > Thanks so much for all this work > > Dave Cramer >
Looks really nice, thanks for the effort to all of you.
One minor glitch though:
I noticed that the new site still uses "9.2 Development" for the link title to the current documentation. As 9.2 is "released", that should simply be called "9.2", shouldn't it? (Like the other versions).
Also it links to /documentation/head/index.html whereas all other links of released versions link to /documentation/x.y/index.html
Given that the current "head" is 9.3, shouldn't that be changed as well?