Re: Using defines for protocol characters
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using defines for protocol characters |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HH+-=08kd-aNCOP9s7fCZHUxrUBvVx5cyBJZzHD49wzPQA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using defines for protocol characters (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Re: Using defines for protocol characters |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 16:59, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 13:25, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > Attached is a patch which introduces a file protocol.h. Instead of using
>> > the actual characters everywhere in the code this patch names the
>> > characters and removes the comments beside each usage.
>>
>> > +#define DESCRIBE_PREPARED 'S'
>> > +#define DESCRIBE_PORTAL 'P'
>>
>> You use these for Close message as well. I don't like the idea because
>> Close is different message from Describe message.
>>
>> What about adding following for Close too use them instead?
>>
>> #define CLOSE_PREPARED 'S'
>> #define CLOSE_PORTAL 'P'
>>
>
> Good catch.
> I recall when writing this it was a bit hacky.
> What do you think of PREPARED_SUB_COMMAND and PORTAL_SUB_COMMAND instead
> of duplicating them ?
Nice. Looks good to me.
New patch attached which uses PREPARED_SUB_COMMAND and PORTAL_SUB_COMMAND instead
and uses
PQMSG_REQ_* and PQMSG_RESP_* as per Alvaro's suggestion
Dave Cramer
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: