Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Cramer
Тема Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?
Дата
Msg-id CADK3HH++YncxTtgCx6eLZ0+tW66TYk0KaEWPGOOztYUQEa9Q6A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?  (Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?
Список pgsql-jdbc
Hi Jorge,


sorry for the late reply. I think both Vladimir and I are just busy. I know he's at a conf in St Petersburg (or Moscow)

I don't think there is any urgency ?


On 2 November 2017 at 12:09, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Dave, the merging (review) of PRs has been a bit slow, is there anything that I can do, to make the process faster?

Jorge Solórzano


On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
Fair enough I"ll look at the PR's you have approved.


On 5 October 2017 at 09:39, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
The idea was to get people to review. How does cutting a version now help us ?


​Some PRs are waiting for 42.2.0​, so I suppose that cut 42.1.5 now and start merging those features for 42.2.0 makes sense...

If there will be no 42.1.5, then why have many PRs on hold?

Waiting to get people to review is not an option since there are PRs that for months haven't received any input. And the ultimate decision is on the maintainers, I have personally reviewed some PRs and give my approval but the PRs are still on hold.



В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jorge Solórzano
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?
Следующее
От: Thomas Kellerer
Дата:
Сообщение: [JDBC] Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?