Re: drop in performance using jdbc driver version 9
| От | Dave Cramer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: drop in performance using jdbc driver version 9 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CADK3HH++UwFKwopxgRjEGFbOo5v2agfDOXF=ja3h1_Dvhq52OA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | drop in performance using jdbc driver version 9 (BENHAMOU Mathieu <mathieu.benhamou@cegedim-srh.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: drop in performance using jdbc driver version 9
Re: drop in performance using jdbc driver version 9 |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Can you be specific about which meta data calls you are making ? Test case ? Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:44 AM, BENHAMOU Mathieu <mathieu.benhamou@cegedim-srh.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > > We have been using postgreSQL for several years and we have just upgraded > the jdbc driver (along with the db server) to version 9. As a result, we are > getting poor performance with the new configuration: operations that took > about 10 seconds using postgresql-8.4-701.jdbc4.jar take more than 2 minutes > now. > > > > To be more accurate, our application relies on some kind of init function > that uses select queries involving metadata and ordinary data. > > 1. This operation takes about 12 seconds when our application is running > with postgresql-8.4-701.jdbc4.jar. It also takes 12 or 15 seconds with > postgresql-9.0dev-800.jdbc3.jar. > > However, it takes more than 120(!) seconds using > postgresql-9.0-801.jdbc3.jar or later versions. > > > > 2. Our guess is that metadata functions have become much slower since > 9.0-801. We also found that many more requests are generated by the metadata > functions. About 1200 request are sent to the database server when running > postgresql-8.4-701.jdbc4.jar, more than 2000 when running > postgresql-9.1-902.jdbc4.jar. > > Methods such as get getIndexInfo() from AbstractJdbc2DatabaseMetaData seem > to have changed a lot, but there are probably other major changes. > > > > 3. Can you confirm that changes in the metadata functions of the JDBC driver > might explain the drop in performance ? > > Is there any workaround that would save us from major surgery in our code ? > > Can we use postgresql-9.0dev-800.jdbc3.jar instead of later versions ? > > Is it safe to use postgresql-8.4-701.jdbc4.jar against a 9.0 server ? > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Mathieu Benhamou > > CEGEDIM-SRH > >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: