Re: Some performance testing?
От | Przemysław Deć |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Some performance testing? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADCcZRmMuESyadD-buRPdcfDdGxVrUCNGUW5VdqNwh5koWziDQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Some performance testing? ("Graeme B. Bell" <grb@skogoglandskap.no>) |
Ответы |
Re: Some performance testing?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Can you say how much faster it was?
Przemek Deć
2015-04-09 11:04 GMT+02:00 Graeme B. Bell <grb@skogoglandskap.no>:
>
> Josh, there seems to be an inconsistency in your blog. You say 3.10.X is
> safe, but the graph you show with the poor performance seems to be from
> 3.13.X which as I understand it is a later kernel. Can you clarify which
> 3.X kernels are good to use and which are not?
Sorry to cut in -
So far we've found kernel 3.18 to be excellent for postgres 9.3 performance (pgbench + our own queries run much faster than with the 2.6.32-504 centos 6 kernel, and we haven't encountered random stalls or slowness).
We use elrepo to get prebuilt rpms of the latest mainline stable kernel (kernel-ml).
http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
Graeme Bell
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: