Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility
| От | Phil Sorber |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CADAkt-jjT8s1tMwi_2wO4xkdC2Q_y6xSiBx0ownCR_jXuPaSPA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> > wrote: >> >> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> > Sure, PQping is useful for this very specific use case of seeing whether >> > the server has finished starting up. If someone came with a plausible >> >> Rename the utility to pg_isready? > > +1, the current version of the patch is already fitted for that and would > not need extra options like the number of packages sent. I am 100% fine with this. I can make this change tomorrow. > -- > Michael Paquier > http://michael.otacoo.com Sorry I haven't jumped in on this thread more, I have limited connectivity where I am.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: