Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility
От | Phil Sorber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADAkt-iaThuDEWkzpwwi87atchRC1pNjWoRY0rH0B3XZ1OA7Lw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com> writes: >> I would also like it to have a regression test >> which none of those seem to have. > > [ shrug... ] There is nothing in the current regression infrastructure > that would work for this, so that desire is pie-in-the-sky regardless of > where you put it in the source tree. Also, PQping itself is exercised > in every buildfarm run as part of "pg_ctl start", so I don't feel a real > strong need to test pg_ping separately. My plan was to borrow heavily from the pg_upgrade test. I want to verify the exit status based on known database state as presumably people would be using this for monitoring/load balancing, etc. Hoping to prevent silly breakage like the help output from returning an 'Accepting Connections' exit status.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: