Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Haroon
Тема Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Дата
Msg-id CAD=LzWFDqvPNOtut--ZUkK5BLZtx=VNBqKY+bMX4eVG70Pwk-g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  ("Haroon ." <contact.mharoon@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

>> I was helping Haroon with this last night. I don't have access to the
>> original thread and he's not around so I don't know how much he said. I'll
>> repeat our findings here.

Craig, I am around now looking into this. I'll update the list as I get more info.

- Haroon

On 24 June 2016 at 11:27, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 24 June 2016 at 10:28, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
>> wrote:
>> >   * Launch a VS x86 command prompt
>> >   * devenv /debugexe bin\initdb.exe -D test
>> >   * Set a breakpoint in initdb.c:3557 and initdb.c:3307
>> >   * Run
>> >   * When it traps at get_restricted_token(), manually move the execution
>> > pointer over the setup of the restricted execution token by dragging &
>> > dropping the yellow instruction pointer arrow. Yes, really. Or, y'know,
>> > comment it out and rebuild, but I was working with a supplied binary.
>> >   * Continue until next breakpoint
>> >   * Launch process explorer and find the pid of the postgres child
>> > process
>> >   * Debug->attach to process, attach to the child postgres. This doesn't
>> > detach the parent, VS does multiprocess debugging.
>> >   * Continue execution
>> >   * vs will trap on the child when it crashes
>>
>> Do you think a crash dump could have been created by creating
>> crashdumps/ in PGDATA as part of initdb before this query is run?
>
>
>
> The answer is "yes" btw. Add "crashdumps" to the static array of directories
> created by initdb and it works great.

As simple as attached..

> Sigh. It'd be less annoying if I hadn't written most of the original patch.

You mean the patch that created the crashdumps/ trick? This has saved
me a couple of months back to analyze a problem TBH.
--
Michael



--
Haroon                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Odd behavior with domains
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)