Re: PostgreSQL limitations question
От | Bartosz Dmytrak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL limitations question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD8_UcaJBeR+vMEtgr4d74-i2HPEcnDoVVOQJuVREySjE6j-AA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL limitations question (David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL limitations question
|
Список | pgsql-general |
2012/7/12 David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com>
How about saying: "No Fixed Limit - see Table Size"
I am sorry for delay. My intention was to start discussion about unlimited number of rows.
I like this idea: "No Fixed Limit - see Table Size"
Another, maybe only academic, discussion is about maximum number of indexes per table. Reason is the same. Indexes are stored in table pg_class (relkind = 'i'), so when we agree number of table rows is limited, then number of indexes is limited too.
There is fair sentence for number of columns - "depending on column type".
I think there should be an explanation what *unlimited* really means.
Thanks for Your attention.
Regards,
Bartek
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: