Re: ALTER ROLE SET/RESET for multiple options
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER ROLE SET/RESET for multiple options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoDdduX80nmz2BtO9vxnQH7DKMfkdQ0kPo5j143CDWg-ZQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER ROLE SET/RESET for multiple options (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALTER ROLE SET/RESET for multiple options
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Payal Singh <payal@omniti.com> wrote: >> The feature seems to work as described, but is it necessary to enclose multiple GUC settings in a parenthesis? This seemsa deviation from the usual syntax of altering multiple settings separated with comma. > > Well, note that you can say: > > ALTER USER bob SET search_path = a, b, c; > > I'm not sure how the parentheses help exactly; it seems like there is > an inherit ambiguity either way. > I thought it would be useful for user who wants to set several GUC parameter for each user. Especially the case where changing logging parameter for each user. But it might not bring us fantastic usability. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: