Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoDcUZfh=D05gwmG9_=uqAjH7AiVwqP8geMn=nZ=DpVupA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements (Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:18 PM Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com> wrote: > > The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: > make installcheck-world: tested, passed > Implements feature: not tested > Spec compliant: not tested > Documentation: not tested > > The patch looks good to me. With regards to the code comments, I had pretty similar concerns as already raised by Dmitry;and those have already been answered by you. So this patch is good to go from my side once you have updated the commentsper your last email. For the 0001 patch, since ReindexIndexInfo is used only within ReindexRelationConcurrently() I think it’s a function-local structure type. So we can declare it within the function. What do you think? Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: