Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "txn" can be used for abbreviation of "Transaction", so for example
>> pg_fdw_txn_resolver?
>> I'm also fine to change the module and function name.
>
> If we're judging the relative clarity of various ways of abbreviating
> the word "transaction", "txn" surely beats "x".
>
> To repeat my usual refrain, is there any merit to abbreviating at all?
>  Could we call it, say, "fdw_transaction_resolver" or
> "fdw_transaction_manager"?
>

Almost modules in contrib are name with "pg_" prefix but I prefer
"fdw_transcation_resolver" if we don't need  "pg_" prefix.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center