Re: [HACKERS] Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is comingfor table which is already removed

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 6/11/17 21:40, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> Thank you for the patch. The patch fixes this issue but it takes a
>> long time to done ALTER SUBSCRIPTION SET PUBLICATION when
>> max_sync_workers_per_subscription is set high value. Because the
>> removing entry from pg_subscription_rel and launching a new table sync
>> worker select a subscription relation state in the same order, the
>> former doesn't catch up with latter.
>> For example in my environment, when I test the following step with
>> max_sync_workers_per_subscription = 15, all table sync workers were
>> launched once and then killed. How about removing the entry from
>> pg_subscription_rel in the inverse order?
>
> I have committed the patch as is.  Optimizations might be possible, but
> let's keep in mind that the use case of changing the subscription right
> after it was created is a pretty marginal case to begin with.
>

Thank you for committing the patch. Yes, I understood.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center