Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to test and review this patches but they seem to conflict
>> with current HEAD. Could you please rebase them?
>
> Hi Sawada-san,
>
> Thanks!  Rebased and attached.  The only changes are: the LWLock
> tranche is now shown as "serializable_xact" instead of "sxact" (hmm,
> LWLock tranches have lower_case_names_with_underscores, but individual
> LWLocks have CamelCaseName...), and ShareSerializableXact() no longer
> does Assert(!IsParallelWorker()).  These changes are based on the last
> feedback from Robert.
>

Thank you! Will look at patches.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center