Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoCho_wkYQhXmkcgoVLfhhcia94s=nMa9z4V8D9r99JzQA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 3:27 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 3:20 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > In addition, olingo and grassquit are showing different kinds of > > "AddressSanitizer: odr-violation" errors, which I'm not sure what to > > make of -- example: odr-violation seems to refer to One Definition Rule (ODR). According to Wikipedia[1]: The One Definition Rule (ODR) is an important rule of the C++ programming language that prescribes that classes/structs and non-inline functions cannot have more than one definition in the entire program and template and types cannot have more than one definition by translation unit. It is defined in the ISO C++ Standard (ISO/IEC 14882) 2003, at section 3.2. Some other programming languages have similar but differently defined rules towards the same objective. I don't fully understand this concept yet but are these two different build failures related? Regards, [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Definition_Rule -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: