Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 16 January 2018 at 06:21, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:40:43AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 9 January 2018 at 04:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> We're not talking about standbys, so the message is incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> Ah, I understood. How about "\"%s\"  has now caught up with upstream
>>>> server"?
>>>
>>> +1.
>>
>> upstream is what I would have suggested, so +1 here also.
>>
>> Will commit.
>
> ping?
>

Should I add this item to "Older Bugs" of the open item since we
regarded it as a bug?

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center