Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
От | Sawada Masahiko |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoCH7xzAS_fOEe7Q35edcX9Hbbtx5gi_4JMbe6nYdqwVeA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2 July 2015 at 16:30, Sawada Masahiko <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Also, the flags of each heap page header might be set PD_ALL_FROZEN, >> as well as all-visible > > > Is it possible to have VM bits set to frozen but not visible? > > The description makes those two states sound independent of each other. > > Are they? Or not? Do we test for an impossible state? > It's impossible to have VM bits set to frozen but not visible. These bit are controlled independently. But eventually, when all-frozen bit is set, all-visible is also set. Regards, -- Sawada Masahiko
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: