Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 6:54 PM John Naylor
<john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
> I wrote:
> > I cleaned up a few things and attached v34 so you can do that if you like.
>
> Of course, "clean" is a relative term. While making a small bit of progress working in tidbitmap.c earlier this week,
Ithought it useful to prototype some things in the tidstore, at which point I was reminded it no longer compiles
becauseof my recent work. I put in the necessary incantations so that the v32 tidstore compiles and passes tests, so
here'sa patchset for that (but no vacuum changes). I thought it was a good time to also condense it down to look more
similarto previous patches, as a basis for future work. 
>

Thank you for updating the patch set. I'll look at updates closely
early next week.


Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com