Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoBw+FM8_YKe+=xqV5Nt_SEZrkT+N4+ANnA=zC-fs1M8oA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > This patch has gotten its fair share of feedback in this fest. I moved > it to the next commitfest. Please do keep working on it and reviewers > that have additional comments are welcome. Thanks! On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Since the destination version is fixed, the advantage of the > plugin mechanism for pg_upgade would be capability to choose a > plugin to load according to some characteristics of the source > database. What do you think the trigger characteristics for > convertLayoutVM_add_frozenbit.so or similars? If it is hard-coded > like what transfer_single_new_db is doing for fsm and vm, I > suppose the module is not necessary to be a plugin. Sorry, I couldn't get it. You meant that we should use rewriteVisibilityMap as a function (not dynamically load)? The destination version is not fixed, it depends on new cluster version. I'm planning that convertLayoutVM_add_frozenbit.so is dynamically loaded and used only when rewriting of VM is required. If layout of VM will be changed again in the future, we could add other libraries for convert Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: