Re: logicalrep_message_type throws an error
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: logicalrep_message_type throws an error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoBs=89deXSWzdNC8Kxk1_3Rpj9qbK49HY6-1J6ADXPXkg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: logicalrep_message_type throws an error (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: logicalrep_message_type throws an error
Re: logicalrep_message_type throws an error |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 6:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > One point to note is that the user may also get confused if the actual > ERROR says message type as 'X' and the context says '???'. I feel in > this case duplicate information is better than different information. I agree. I think it would be better to show the same string like: ERROR: invalid logical replication message type "??? (88)" CONTEXT: processing remote data for replication origin "pg_16638" during message type "??? (88)" in transaction 796, finished at 0/1626698 Since the numerical value is important only in invalid message type cases, how about using a format like "??? (88)" in unknown message type cases, in both error and context messages? Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: