Re: Logical WAL sender unresponsive during decoding commit
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical WAL sender unresponsive during decoding commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoBouKadAdf5zadYBPuzmKK9R7kF7oA4s2hGtCcZwqpF0g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Logical WAL sender unresponsive during decoding commit (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logical WAL sender unresponsive during decoding commit
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:31 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 10:56 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:08 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:28 AM Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi hackers! > > > > > > > > Some time ago I've seen a hanging logical replication that was trying to send transaction commit after doing tablepg_repack. > > > > I understand that those things do not mix well. Yet walsender was ignoring pg_terminate_backend() and I think thisworth fixing. > > > > Can we add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(); somewhere in this backtrace? > > > > > > > > > > I think if we want to do this in this code path then it may be it is > > > better to add it in ReorderBufferProcessTXN where we are looping to > > > process each change. > > > > +1 > > > > The same issue is recently reported[1] on -bugs and I proposed the > > patch that adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to the loop in > > ReorderBufferProcessTXN(). I think it should be backpatched. > > > > I agree that it is better to backpatch this as well. Would you like to > verify if your patch works for all branches or if it need some tweaks? > Yes, I've confirmed v10 and master but will do that for other branches and send patches for all supported branches. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: