Re: parallel vacuum comments

On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:53 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:35 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It returns true in the above condition but it should return false
> > since the index doesn't support parallel index cleanup at all. It
> > seems that this bug was introduced by commit b4af70cb21 (therefore
> > exists only in PG14) which flipped the return values of this function
> > but missed one place. The index AMs that don't support parallel index
> > cleanup at all are affected by this bug. Among the supported index AM
> > in the core, hash indexes are affected but since they just return the
> > number of blocks during vacuumcleanup it would not become a serious
> > consequence.
> >
> > I've attached a patch to fix it.
>
> I pushed your fix just now.

Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/