Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoAhkEFGeHK-_65zsTn1NefVR63W2wjVrSjHgLw10uHqTA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 4:26 PM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 08:39:58PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 7:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 8:25 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'll take care of this today. I think we can mark the new function > > > > get_column_offset() being introduced by this patch as parallel safe. > > > > > > Pushed. > > > > Thanks! > > I took a closer look at the test case. The "get_column_offset(coltypes) % 8" > part would have caught the problem only when run on an ALIGNOF_DOUBLE==4 > platform. Instead of testing the start of the typalign='d' column, let's test > the first offset beyond the previous column. The difference between those two > values depends on ALIGNOF_DOUBLE. Yes, but it could be false positives in some cases. For instance, the column {oid, bool, XLogRecPtr} should be okay on ALIGNOF_DOUBLE == 4 and 8 platforms but the new test fails. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: