Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoAfpnjEedzxWs6kN0i=nByMR-0Y_MzymSM_TuaW0vbLsA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera >>> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>> Jim Nasby wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think things like pageinspect are very different; I really can't see any >>>>> use for those beyond debugging (and debugging by an expert at that). >>>> >>>> I don't think that necessarily means it must continue to be in contrib. >>>> Quite the contrary, I think it is a tool critical enough that it should >>>> not be relegated to be a second-class citizen as it is now (let's face >>>> it, being in contrib *is* second-class citizenship). >>>> >>> >>> Attached patch is latest patch. >> >> The previous patch lacks some files for regression test. >> Attached fixed v12 patch. > > The patch could be applied cleanly. "make check" could pass successfully. > But "make check-world -j 2" failed. > Thank you for looking at this patch. Could you tell me what test you got failed? make check-world -j 2 or more is done successfully in my environment. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: