Re: [E] Re: BUG #18938: Logical replication failure in 16.9: "invalid memory alloc request size 1372786672"
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [E] Re: BUG #18938: Logical replication failure in 16.9: "invalid memory alloc request size 1372786672" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoAdnGOC=c1dxyzKCO_-dHs4gLBF9YRUnd3mmD2Qzc_XJQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18938: Logical replication failure in 16.9: "invalid memory alloc request size 1372786672" (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 8:32 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:43 AM John Hutchins > <John.Hutchins@wicourts.gov> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > Thanks very much for your reply. > > > > > The configuration details would help the investigation. > > > > Here are all configs which may be relevant: > > > > wal_level = logical > > max_replication_slots = 20 > > max_logical_replication_workers = 14 > > max_wal_senders = 20 > > wal_keep_size = 4096 > > max_wal_size = 4GB > > min_wal_size = 1GB > > wal_sender_timeout = 300s > > archive_mode = on > > archive_command = 'true' > > archive_timeout = 3600 > > max_worker_processes = 18 > > max_connections = 1000 > > shared_buffers = 10GB > > maintenance_work_mem = 2GB > > work_mem = 26214kB > > effective_cache_size = 30GB > > effective_io_concurrency = 200 > > > > > IIUC this issue could happen especially if there are many concurrent > > > transactions that perform DDLs. Does this match the workload on your > > > server? > > > > I'm not sure if our workload would contain "many concurrent transactions that perform DDLs." Our workload includes DDLsto create temporary tables and also "ALTER TABLE ENABLE/DISABLE TRIGGER" statements that are single-threaded, but mayrun concurrently with other DML operations. So, in our workloads, there is a possibility of overlap between DDL (triggermanagement and temporary table creation) and DML from other sessions. > > > > It can happen in this workload due to the reason explained in email > [1]. We are talking about the right fix for the problem. I pushed the fix for this issue[1]. Regards, [1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=d87d07b7ad3b782cb74566cd771ecdb2823adf6a -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: