Re: [HACKERS] Unused variable scanned_tuples in LVRelStats
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Unused variable scanned_tuples in LVRelStats |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoAccDmos-GA3c_PB7LYBJPkuQ9hXmjA41U4+HA_09UwaQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Unused variable scanned_tuples in LVRelStats (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: >> So we can remove scanned_tuples from LVRelStats struct and change the >> variable name num_tuples to scanned_tuples. Attached updated patch. > > On second thought, I think we should just leave this alone. > scanned_tuples is closely tied to tupcount_pages, so it's a little > confusing to pull one out and not the other. And we can't pull > tupcount_pages out of LVRelStats because lazy_cleanup_index needs it. > The current situation isn't doing any harm, so I'm not seeing much > point in changing it. > Hmm, since I agree the current situation isn't doing any harm actually I don't push hard for this but I'd like to still propose at least the original patch that fixes an inconsistent in the code. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: