Re: pg_basebackup behavior on non-existent slot
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup behavior on non-existent slot |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoAYD5GPUmTYQGNJ+nOEs8zZGVN8UUnjCb1UZW8k81byjA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup behavior on non-existent slot (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 4:11 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 12:54:58PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 10:15 PM Gerard H. Pille <ghpille@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> The old thread: > >> https://postgrespro.com/list/thread-id/2337189#CAMkU=1wSxYBNFY9TzuVh3=mDLr4BBsMct6wcViNMH+-6Xon4Uw@mail.gmail.com > > A link to postgresql.org does the same work: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMkU=1wSxYBNFY9TzuVh3=mDLr4BBsMct6wcViNMH+-6Xon4Uw@mail.gmail.com > No need to redirect that elsewhere. > > > It seems it's not fixed yet even in HEAD as far as I tested. There > > were some ideas to fix that on that thread but the main point was how > > to fix it on Windows. I guess that since it creates a transient slot > > it’s not a common case to specify a non-existence slot in pg_baseback > > but what is your use case? This might help motivate to fix this issue. > > > > BTW in that thread, there was a discussion on how to detect the > > streamer process failure in the main process but probably we can fix > > this by just doing an existence check for the specified name > > replication slot before starting the streamer process? > > Yeah. Honestly, I am not really excited to redesign this part of base > backups just to take care of a side problem that is mitigated for most > users with the use of a temporary slot. I think that this problem can happen also when using a temporary slot. If the slot loses WAL file due to max_slot_wal_keep_size, the streamer process could fail even while streaming WAL. I guess that the main process taking a base backup won't stop in this case. If it's true, pre-checking the existence of the slot might not be enough. > It would be simpler, as you > say, to find a way to detect if the slot wanted exists before even > launching START_REPLICATION with the specified slot on the second > thread copying the WAL, but that would be a new thing as one cannot do > catalog lookups with a physical replication session. Good point. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: