On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:45 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:27:51PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > I thought that too, but I thought it's better to ignore it, instead of
> > erroring out. For example, we can specify both --disable and
> > --progress options to pg_checksum commands, but we don't write any
> > progress information in this case.
>
> Well, if you don't feel strongly about that, that's fine by me as
> well, so I have applied your v3 with the tweaks I posted previously,
> without the restriction on --skip-checksums.
Thank you!
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com