Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoA5C4kBrrhXqkJ1X5FSfAVwPT_Ooa9SHkiLZ6nfe5w7Tg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Doug Doole <DougDoole@gmail.com> writes: >> Looks good to me. >> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer > > Pushed. Grepping found a few more places that should be changed to > use these macros rather than referencing btpo_flags directly, > so I did that. Thank you! > I tend to agree with Alvaro that it'd be better to get rid of > BT_READ/BT_WRITE in favor of using the same buffer flags used > elsewhere; but I also agree that as long as they're there we > should use them, so I included that change as well. > Agreed. Thanks, again. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: