Re: HDD vs SSD without explanation
| От | Brian Busch |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: HDD vs SSD without explanation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CACnr6BaOtQTRNGi-fQJ-2HA-tRnrzEO5ic-coyP6AEPyBJuNkA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: HDD vs SSD without explanation ("Georg H." <georg-h@silentrunner.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
we've had the same experience here - with older SATA 2 (3Gbps) - in spite of SSD having no spin latency, the bus speed itself was half of the SAS-2 (6Gbps) we were using at the time which negated SSD perf in this area. HDD was about the same perf as SSD for us.
BiranOn Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Georg H. <georg-h@silentrunner.de> wrote:
Hello Neto
Am 14.01.2018 um 21:44 schrieb Neto pr:Dear allyou are comparing a SAS Drive against a SATA SSD. Their interfaces serve a completely different bandwidth.
Someone help me analyze the two execution plans below (Explain ANALYZE used), is the query 9 of TPC-H benchmark [1].
I'm using a server HP Intel Xeon 2.8GHz/4-core - Memory 8GB HDD SAS 320GB 15 Krpm AND SSD Sansung EVO 500GB.
My DBMS parameters presents in postgresql.conf is default, but in SSD I have changed random_page_cost = 1.0.
While a SAS-3 device does 12 Gbit/s SATA-3 device is only able to transfer 6 Gbit/s (a current SAS-4 reaches 22.5 Gbit/s)
Do a short research on SAS vs SATA and then use a SAS SSD for comparison :)
regards
Georg
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: