Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types
| От | Kevin Grittner |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CACjxUsPaS5kDEwrmLpW+PujQ9kUL+Z0whwPBFQdZRmhag9pmaQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com> wrote: > These patches apply and build on top of 5c609a74 with no problems, > but `make check` finds differences per the attached. Please > investigate why the regression tests are failing and what the > appropriate response is. >> I am not much experienced in C. If you think that inline functions >> are better suited, I can rework the patches. > > I suspect that they will be as fast or faster, and they eliminate > the hazard of multiple evaluation, where a programmer might not be > aware of the multiple evaluation or of some side-effect of an > argument. Emre, are you going to address the above? It would have to be Real Soon Now. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: